Barriers would have devastating effects on Hudson River ecology; Timeline is revamped in response to demands for public participation and details of plans
OSSINING — After months of public pressure, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has agreed to allow more time and transparency before advancing any of its storm flood protection plans for New York Harbor – many of which have potentially devastating consequences for the Hudson River ecosystem.
Six conceptual plans are currently under review in the Corps’ New York – New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries (NYNJHAT) Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. Four of them call for construction of massive, in-water storm surge barriers – giant ocean gates – that would cost as much as $140 billion, permanently and fundamentally damage the life of the Hudson and fail to address flooding from sea level rise – only storms.
The Corps presented the six options to the public in July with barely any notice and little information. Since then, thousands of individuals, numerous environmental groups, elected officials and at least 17 Hudson Valley communities have formally demanded more time, information and public participation.
What’s new:
Read Riverkeeper’s update in full:
Army Corps yields to pressure on NY Harbor storm surge barrier plans
For background, read the New York City’s Economic Development Council report, “A Stronger, More Resilient New York” Chapter on Coastal Protection, 2013:
“In theory, one way to achieve the City’s goals for its coastline may be the construction of massive protective infrastructure, such as harborwide storm surge barriers at the entrances to New York Harbor. As attractive as the concept of a single “silver bullet” solution may be, though, a closer examination of this strategy strongly suggests that relying on such a solution would pose significant risks to the city that far outweigh its theoretical benefits.”